
It’s a balmy Spring day in DC, Skunkeye welcomes the blooms but wishes the throngs of touristas would go away. Stole away from the office to catch the Jim Dine exhibit at the National Gallery of Art. Realized halfway across the Mall that I might run into those awful NGA girls from that unfortunate party I went to last weekend but figured, what the hell…
Jim Dine was never one of my favorite Pop Artists – dunno why – and I’ve seen and enjoyed quite a few of his later drawings and prints in shows and art magazines. Somehow his work never made any lasting impact on me, or I failed to associate the work I really liked with Jim Dine. I know I’ve clipped quite of few reproductions of his work and put them in my notebooks – in fact, some of these works are in this exhibition. At any rate, the current exhibit, though I wish it could be larger, is a real revelation and a enjoyable glimpse into the mind of Jim Dine and what makes him tick and turns him on.
The work in this exhibit was all created after 1971, after Dine’s Pop prime. There’s something really subversive about a Pop artist diving into more traditional drawing, and I’m sure Dine knew that. So basically since 1971, he was teaching himself how to draw, using the traditional art school methods of charcoal, pastels, life drawing, and learning from the old masters. He’s always questioning, exploring “what exactly is a drawing?” – as I was, and countless others were, in school. Dine draws on a variety of materials - printing press felt, acetate, and porcelain. And when he draws on paper it never just a flat sheet – it is ripped, scrubbed, distressed and folded. While employing traditional drawing tools such as charcoal and pastel, he Dine also uses industrial enamel and other non-orthodox mediums. And many of Dines drawings actually look like prints rather than drawings. He challenges the notion of what a drawing should be and is defined. For example, if you use charcoal on stretched canvas is it a drawing or painting?
The large “Name Painting #1” – charcoal on canvas – is the piece that greets visitors when they enter the exhibit. On it Dine has written hundreds of names of the individuals who have influenced him in his life and as an artist – the charcoal lines blur and run into each other, names comes forward and recede, history blending and erasing and the mark making as a primal as cave drawing. Bit like an absinthe-soaked cousin of the more refined Cy Twombly (who has a similar fascination with the ancient world)
It’s kind of a sexy show – Dine’s trademark images – tools - drills, hammers, and clamps become shadowy pubis and ghostly phalluses. Well, at least that's what Skunkeye saw - its open to interpretation. Several life drawings of nudes, faces ripped off, red glove attached, some with De Koonig-like wild women eyes. And in his later work highly charged drawings of classical nude statues are plentiful, including a rather dynamic triple-study of a hermaphrodite torso. Dunno, kinda lurid.
In his self-portraits, Dine looks like a sage. Large drawings of owls abound. In fact, the last room in the exhibit contain his "Glyptothek" series, which are luminescent monoprint-like drawing of the antiquities held at Munich’s Staatliche Antikensammlungen und Glyptothek – you can see Dine in his rendering of bust of famous greek philosophers. The show seems to explore the theme as the artist as creator or alchemist. Perhaps a modern day Geppetto would be an apt description of Dine.
Skunkeye really digs his Pinnochio series. Almost as if Dr. Frankenstein pieced together Pinnochio out of sugar and spice and a whole lotta nasty - the puppet boy even appears to have a boner in some of the drawings. Skunkeye has a hard-on for Jim Dine. Rock on National Gallery!